Update on Cal/OSHA PELs
Ed Kanegsberg, SQRC
    Cal/OSHA has established a new policy for determining recommended workplace
    exposure limits for airborne chemicals and has also named a panel of experts.
    Once approved, the Permissible Exposure Levels (PELs) developed by Cal/OSHA
    would be legally enforceable throughout California. One might expect the
          PELs to be utilized elsewhere in the U.S. Further, because the new
          policy indicates
    utilization of risk factors developed for a community exposure approach (similar
    to that used for Proposition 65), there is a reasonable potential for the
          new PELs to be significantly lower than those set by Federal OSHA or
          by nationally-recognized
    professional organizations such as AIHA. An initial meeting will be held
  on August 21.
  The April issue
  of Green Files  focused on the process that
      the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), usually referred
  to as Cal/OSHA, has adopted for reviewing and establishing Permissible Exposure
      Levels (PELs). On June 19, the division held a public meeting to announce
      the members on the Health Expert Advisory Committee (HEAC), and to discuss
      a preliminary
      list of substances to be reviewed with a priority (ranging from 1 to 4)
  for
      each. Among the 15 members named to the HEAC is James Unmack, a member
  of the SQRC Technical Advisory Panel (please see related article). 
  The first meeting of the HEAC will take place on August 21, 2007 in Oakland,
        CA. It will be open to the public. At this first meeting it is expected
          that a review of the previous Airborne Contaminants Advisory Committee
          (ACAC)
        process for PEL recommendations will occur and be modified for the current
        HEAC process.
        In addition, a summary sheet format to be used for each substance to
          be analyzed by the HEAC will be developed. The summary sheet promises
          to provide a standardized
      format for dealing with complex issues of toxicology. 
  The chemicals selected for the first round of analysis will be named.
          Emphasis is likely to be on chemicals for which there is no current
          PEL at either
        the state or federal level and that appear on the Prop. 65 list. 
  One goal of the new PEL process is to assure transparency. A good way
            to achieve transparency is through attendance at the HEAC meetings,
            active listening,
            and communication. Most important is positive support for those involved
            in
            the exceedingly difficult task of evaluating complex toxicological
          studies.
  A roster of HEAC members, the current PEL update priority chemicals
              list, and information about previous meetings can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/doshreg/5155Meetings.htm  .